![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Member Map | Members List | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#81 | |||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 6,822
|
Quote:
![]() That being said, I see nothing wrong with the challenge of pushing a motor to it's max. |
|||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#82 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shoreview, Mn
Posts: 123
|
As long as it can handle 300-350 whp, it'll be fine for me. And even that is probably gonna be too much for the stock (or even well set up coilovers) to be able to put to the ground without melting the tires.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |||
|
O, not zero. ;)
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 5,706
|
Quote:
__________________
- "If you are flammable and have legs, then you are never blocking a fire exit. You can write that down and put a dash in front of it, and put my name at the bottom." Mitch Hedberg |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#84 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 217
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
'00 Focus ZX3 turbo - 13.38@104 - sure do miss ya buddy ![]() '02 Focus SVT - sold to nephew '07 Mazda CX-7 '08 EVO GSR - new ride!!! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 181
|
put it to the ground is the issue and it isn't just the tires, the whole chasis needs to be able to handle that kind of power and torque.
my favorite example What do a 300, 600 and 1200 hp Supra have in common? They all run 13's |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 146
|
Older then the internet. but still funny.
__________________
Hyundai Salesman. DSMtuner. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | ||
|
O, not zero. ;)
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 5,706
|
No way, it's fun watching the chassis twist and flex in the air on launch.. Nothing like the fox bodies that try to do a barrel roll off the line.
![]()
__________________
- "If you are flammable and have legs, then you are never blocking a fire exit. You can write that down and put a dash in front of it, and put my name at the bottom." Mitch Hedberg |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shoreview, Mn
Posts: 123
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#89 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 1,494
|
Quote:
I am aiming for around 300-350 rwhp, yes it would be nice to hang with a Z06 and all, but eventually you have to find your limit, keeping in mind your daily driving it, and only able to use 60% of the potential. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | ||
|
O, not zero. ;)
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 5,706
|
With that mentality you shouldn't ever mod anything, because you won't reach the limits of a stock car on the road anyway.
![]()
__________________
- "If you are flammable and have legs, then you are never blocking a fire exit. You can write that down and put a dash in front of it, and put my name at the bottom." Mitch Hedberg |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#91 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 181
|
Its not the ability to use the power I take issue with, its the cost vs. return. If I can make my car as fast as yours with 100 less hp b/c the chasis can't handle it and your just spinning tires and wearing out your drive train why would spend the additional cost to make that extra usless power? Not to mention the costs usually starting going up exponentially when you start replacing major components like turbos, diffs axles etc...
Sure, there are pepole that will do it, just becuase they have have the biggest @ick on the block, but thats not going to be 98% of people on this site. From what I can see thus far, the car is likely capable of handling about ~325whp without any major issues issues such as tranny strength, cooling etc... It is likely bolt ons will get either the v6 or the I4 most of the way there. Bang for your buck, that is likely to be the best choice. When A new car comes out, alot of new to modding enthusiasts start thinking about how much power than can make without thinking rationally about the consequences of having a 400+ HP car. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#92 | |||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 6,822
|
Quote:
It's when those two team up and make the ungodly fast huge horsepower behemoth of a car that makes the teeth in back rattle and the hair on the back of your neck stand straight up! |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#93 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,002
|
the chassis is not a problem especially since its even stiffer then the E46 M3
To reach 400WHP in the I4 would probably only need an EvoX turbo and the pipping to help it. That and a clutch. 400RWHP is scary the 1st time I won't lie. But going over 170mph is also very scary the 1st time around. 500whp is about the limit where it starts to become completely useless on the street since you cant enjoy it on 90% of US streets. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#94 | |||
|
O, not zero. ;)
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Greenwood, SC
Posts: 5,706
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
- "If you are flammable and have legs, then you are never blocking a fire exit. You can write that down and put a dash in front of it, and put my name at the bottom." Mitch Hedberg |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#95 | ||
|
Topless = More Fun 4 Me!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Juan, PR
Posts: 768
|
^^^ Some people like dyno queens, others like fast cars. My idea of building a sport car is to make it as fast as you can while maintaining reliability and the most efficiency possible. No need to inject 200 extra horsepower if they will only show up in a dyno not the road and much less pretty useless to have those extra 100-200hp if you'll have to rebuild the engine every few months.
__________________
Currently own: 2003 Eclipse Spyder GTS - Chrome Blue Pearl Next car: Genesis Coupe 2.0T Track - Bathurst Black |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#96 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 69
|
Structurally I believe the 2.0T won't last long past 400-450whp. Although I might be wrong (and I hope I am) but the open deck design will hold people from making huge numbers. The V6 might be the option for bigger power. Either way you'll have to spend some dough to get above those power levels on either platform. Although 300-350whp, IMO, is perfect. It's good to see you can fit some fat tires in the rear to help plant the power.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |||
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Coming from a 348rwhp car, I can say that 348 is a lot of fun, but pretty managable. Obviously you have to be more careful (especially in the rain), but I think 350-400whp isn't too crazy for a daily driver.You're probably right about 500whp being useless on the streets (but still sounds like a lot of fun ). I think a lot of people are a bit intimidated about having a faster car, but as long as you drive smart and make sure you have the supporting mods you should be ok. On a side note: My scariest driving experience was driving on bald tires in the rain in my old V6 Mustang. ![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#98 | |||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#99 | ||
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5
|
True, but I was thinking more around the size of the Gen Coupe. Obviously 400whp in a Geo Metro is goingto differ from a 400whp Nissan Armada.
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#100 | |||
|
Topless = More Fun 4 Me!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Juan, PR
Posts: 768
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Currently own: 2003 Eclipse Spyder GTS - Chrome Blue Pearl Next car: Genesis Coupe 2.0T Track - Bathurst Black |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|