you guys have to start reading what I am writing.
1. It was implied that once a tire is studded, it will grip LESS than its non studded twin on dry pavement. I replied why this is false.
2. Someone said due to soft compound, winter tires will grip better than summer tires in warm weather, I replied why this is rediculous. And only MAYBE if it was bald and was like a slick.
3. Now someone is comparing performance winters to all out winter tires, performance winters were never the subject of discussion.
The peanut gallery is was too quick to comment before understanding the subject.
This has turned into one very complicated thread.
Ok, now THIS makes some sense.
I did read what you wrote, but what you wrote wasn't clear (to the reader: i've no doubt you knew exactly what you were saying).
so:
1] This is definitely clearer. All anyone (not just you) had said was "winter tires don't work on dry pavement". There was no explicit mention of studded vs non-studed. As performance winter tires are, by definition, winter tires, and we drive a performance car, fair game, IMO. However, you're right: studed vs non-studded, on the same tire, in the same non-ice conditions should be nearly identical. Although the studded will not make you a favorite of your local municipality on dry, clear roads.
2] I think 'warm weather' needs to be defined: for me, if you're talking winter tires, then warm weather is those warm days during winter, maybe 2oC, +/-5oC. If you're talking summertime, then yeah, totally true. A serious summer/performance tire will outperform any other tire during the summer: just like a winter tire will out perform a summer tire (which goes to sh1t at about +5oc and lower) on a 'warm winter day'.
3] I think, given the car, the forum, and the sizes/stagger that we're talking about, Performance winter tires, and the appropriate time to use them have to be part of the discussion. To discount their use on this kind of car is silly. BUT, if you're sticking to point 1], same tire, studded vs non-studded, then yes, you're absolutely right, they're a non-starter as far as the discussion is concerned.
As for the peanut gallery (and my place in it

) I think the original discussion, and where it was going, was understood by the two people who started it, BUT was vague enough that anyone reading it didn't specifically realize the very, very narrow scope of the it. Given that scope, your points are totally valid. Given what everyone but you and the OP were reading, the scope didn't seem so narrow. Clarity in the discussion is everything.
Back on the original discussion: how is the feel of studded tires on dry/cold pavement? I've never driven them: none of the municipalities I've ever lived in have had the conditions to allow, or need, them. On the topic of studded tires, I'm happy to let you and the OP, who obviously know their sh1t, educate me. I know diddly about studded, other than what I've started to learn the last two days, as a result of this discussion.