did you see the other videos?

seems slow:

 

i emailed this guy in youtube a couple of days ago and he replied me back in less than an hour saying this:

"Hi
This product is currently being developed

At the end of the development in the future I will contact you.



Premium gasoline

400 hp 48 Torque

EATON MP112 supercharger & Liquid Cooler

English is not easy


I'll call you back"

 

There was another video w/ a supercharger where the guys tach ROCKETS up, this one seems to crawl (which doesn't mean much). The torque, I'm sure, is still there somewhere.

 

Maybe he was correct about the "48" torque :rofl: ... it's good to see more supercharged coupes getting out there though

 

either way, sounds badass

 

damn...that's insaneulous

 

Twin turbo > supercharger

 

i like how u think

 

i wish these guys would get it together as far as forced induction on the 3.8

 

theres nothing sicker than a supercharger whine!!

 

+ 1 - I may have watched Mad Max a few to many times though...

 

Not sure if this has been posted before but enlightened by our spirited discussions regarding the NGM S/C'er, I found this on YouTUBE and found it very interesting...

Looks like the Koreans successfully mounted a Magnuson MP112 blower without requiring a different hood. I wonder how the tuning was accomplished too

 

.. I wonder how the tuning was accomplished too
.

That should be the first question anytime boost is being added to or increased on any engine.

Not sure if it's the same one, but a similar s/c was used on this one.

http://www.gencoupe.com/media/44035-3-8-supercharger.html

 

where's the intake?

 

Between the firewall and strut tower on the left side. The filter is green. You can see it clearly at the 11 sec mark.

 

Looks like an auto trans too.......

 

i dont get the tq numbers...not really familiar with superchargers...they don't make that much tq?

 

The listed values aren't even torque. They're kilograms per meter. That's a measure of spring constant </engineer>

Either way, if I assume they meant kilogram-meters rather than kilograms per meter (which of course they did)

59 (kg m) = 426.747817 ft pounds

not bad, i'd say.

 

Thats kilograms per meter not pounds per foot, you can google the conversion equation.

 

ohh makes sense now, i thought it was "nm"(newton per meter?). wasnt familiar with that term listed on the video. :sad:

 

ohh makes sense now, i thought it was "nm"(newton per meter?). wasnt familiar with that term listed on the video. :sad:

nm is newton-metres
n/m would be newtons per meter

one is force times distance (torque)
the other is force per distance (spring stiffness)

It's a common mistake, but I point it out because you ?'d it above.

 

@KD, yah I didnt see that video.

 

yup great thanks for the info!

 

Really depends on what your tuning goal is. For pure high HP numbers, single turbo is actually the way to go. For a linear power band with gobs of torque, a supercharger is a really great fit. Twin turbo setups bridge the gap between the two, but add a lot of cost and complexity. How many people who go around saying "twin turbo > supercharger", how many are going to plunk down the change for either?

 

How many people who go around saying "twin turbo > supercharger", how many are going to plunk down the change for either?

Real money, or Forza credits?